Innovation Diffusion of Tasikmalaya City Government and Bildungswerk Der Saechsischen Wirtschaft (BSW) in Small and Medium Industry Development of Embroidery Craft in Tasikmalaya City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v20i1.589Keywords:
Teacher Performance, Emotional Intelligence, CompetenceAbstract
This study examines the stagnation of the embroidery craft industry in Tasikmalaya City, marked by limited market segments, lack of product diversification, and declining competitiveness. In response, the Tasikmalaya City Government collaborated with Bildungswerk Der Saechsischen Wirtschaft (BSW) from Germany in 2017 to enhance the global competitiveness of local embroidery SMEs. The research focuses on the diffusion of innovation based on Rogers’ theory (2003), which includes innovation characteristics, communication channels, time, and social system characteristics. A qualitative case study approach was used, with data collected through interviews, documentation, observation, and focus group discussions. The findings reveal that innovation was not adopted due to ineffective diffusion, caused by a lack of government commitment, limited resources, cultural resistance to change, unsupportive policies, and insufficient involvement of community leaders. The study underscores the need for effective innovation diffusion strategies and highlights the importance of political leadership, bureaucratic support, and international cooperation in ensuring the sustainability and success of embroidery SME development.
References
Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and Climatefor innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 430-43. doi:10.1108/14601069810199131
Alberti, A., & Bertucci, G. (2007). Innovation in Governance and Public Administration: Key Issues and Perspectives. In Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Ed., Innovations in Governance in the Middle East, North Africa, and Western Balkans: Making Governments Work Better in the Mediterranean Region (pp. 3-12). New York: United Nations.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigm: of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal a Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120024403.
Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. (2004) Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Vol. 67. Washington: Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1215
Ansell, Chris and Alison Gash, 2007. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 543- 571.
Andhika, Lesmana Rian. (2018). Elemen dan Faktor Governansi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Pemerintah (Element and Factor Governance Innovation in Government Public Service). Inovasi Pembangunan–Jurnal Kelitbangan, 6(3). https://journalbalitbangdalampung.org.
Batalli, Mirlinda. (2011). Impact of Public Administration Innovations on Enchancing the Citizens‟ Expectation, International Journal of e-Education, e-Bussines, e-Manajemen and e-Learning, 1(2).
Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and Innovation in the Public Sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.doi:10.1108/01437730210449357
Borins, S. (2008). Research on Innovations in Government: What Next? In S. Borins, Ed., Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication (pp.199-205). Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
Boniface, C. M. (2011). Organization culture as driver of competitive advantage, Journal of Academic & Business Ethics.
Darusman, Yus. (2016). Kearifan Lokal Kerajinan Bordir Tasikmalaya Sebagai Ekonomi Kreatif Terbuka Untuk Modern (Studi di Kota Tasikmalaya Jawa Barat). Journal of Nonformal Education, Vol.2 No.2.
Dibra, M. (2015). Rogers Theory on Diffusion of Innovation-The Most Appropriate Theoretical Model in the Study of Factors Difusi Inovasi Pembelajaran Tematik 125 Influencing the Integration of Sustainability in Tourism Businesses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.443
Dooley, K. E., & D, P. (1999). Towards a Holistic Models For the Diffusion of Educational Technologies an Integrative Review of Educational Innovation Studies. Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 35–45.
Elanor D Glor, 2003. Applying Innovatice Proceesses to Improve Governance and Public Administration and Reduce Poverty, Innovation Journal: The Pubic Sector Innovation Journal, 12(2), article 6.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi T., Balogh, S. (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access Published. Vol 22 No.1 Hal. 1-29.
Faidati, Nur dan Muthmainah, Nur Fitri. (2019). Collaborative Governance Dalam Pengembangan UMKM di Era Revolusi Industri. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi, 3(1).
Heffy, M. (2009). Reformasi Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Menuju Good Governance. Jurnal Borneo Administrator.
Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). Uniformity in Local Government System and the Governance Model in Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909616666105
Jamilah, Joharotul., et. al. (2016). Keterlekatan Etika Moral Islam dan Sunda dalam Bisnis Bordir di Tasikmalaya (Embeddedness of Moral and Culture Institutions with mbroidery Entrepreunership in Tasikmalaya). Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan (IPB), hal 233-241.
Jiang, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2016). Integrating Knowledge Activities for Team Innovation: Effects of Transformational Leadership. Journal of
Hapzah, Siti Nur., dkk. (2020). Tata Kelola Inovasi Pelayanan Publik: Dimensi Kelembagaan, Aktor Kebijakan dan Masyarakat. PUBLISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Volume: 5 (2),153-164. http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jkpp ISSN:
Kwan, L. Y., Leung, A. K., & Liou, S. (2014). Culture, Creativity, and Innovation. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 45(4), 671-672.doi:10.1177/0022022114529381
Mariana, Dede. (2010). Otonomi Daerah dan Inovasi Kebijakan Publik, Jurnal Governance, 1(1).
Navarro F Marinez. (2016). From Government Innovation to Public Innovation. The ICT as Key Tools. International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 2(6), 4-7.
Norris, J. J. (2014). Rethinking Accountability in New Governance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(3),199-219.
Rusdiana. (2014). Konsep Inovasi Pendidikan. Pustaka Setia. Sa’ud, U. S. (2013). Inovasi Pendidikan (Riduwan (ed.); 6th ed.).
Satibi, I. (2019). Model Kerjasama Pelayanan Pemerintahan Berbasis Customer Service. Jurnal Ilmu Kebijakan:Administrasi. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v10i2.1655
Sasaki, M. (2018). Application of diffusion of innovation theory to educational accountability: the case of EFL education in Japan. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0052-1
Shea, P., & Pickett, A. (2005). Increasing access to Higher Education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. 6(2), 1–27.
Spiering, K., & Erickson, S. (2006). Study abroad as innovation: Applying the diffusion model to international education. International Education Journal, 7(3), 314–322.
Sururi, Ahmad. (2017). Inovasi Kebijakan dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik Menuju Terwujudnya (Good Public Policy Governance Innovation of Policy in Public Administration Perspective toward The Realization of Good Public Policy Governance). Jurnal Spirit Publik, 12(2), 14-31.
Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and Innovation in Public Sector Services: The Case of the Digital Library. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 237-249.
Vigoda Gadot et al, 2008. Public Sector Innovation for Europe: A Multinational Eight – Country Exploration of Citizens Perspectives, Journal Public Administration, Volume 86, issue 2, page 307-329.
Zennouche, M., Zhang, J., & Wang, B. W. (2014). Factors Influencing Innovation at Individual, Group and Organisational Levels: A Content Analysis. International Journal Information Systems and Change Management, 7(1), 23-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 TEC EMPRESARIAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






