Social innovation and institutional capacity in Latin America

Authors

  • Manuel Arenilla Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, España

Keywords:

Administrative Innovation, Public Management, Institutional Development, Administrative Capacity, Public Services, Social Context, Latin America.

Abstract

Social innovation and institutional capacity in Latin America The current economic and financial crisis has led the most developed countries to abandon the old belief in an omnipotent State and an unlimited level of well-being, while at the same time questioning the extension and consolidation of basic public services in Latin America. Today, the capacity of States to meet the diversity of citizen demands and needs, to integrate the entire population into public action and to combat poverty is being questioned. Added to this is the loss of confidence of citizens in public institutions and in their members and leaders. There are profound changes in society and in the market, which show that they are assuming an increasing role in meeting the needs of the community. This gives rise to an expanded reality of the public, which can no longer be limited to the administrative or state sphere. At the same time, the State is expanding its role to enabler, guarantor and activator of society and is required to focus on inclusion, participation and representation and the creation of effective alliances. In this context, the approach of social innovation emerges, which is nourished by the evolution of ideas and governance of previous decades and the principles of the knowledge society, such as collaboration and the connection of talent; and which is being built primarily from international organizations and governments. One of its main meanings is the co-production of public services in order to promote the renewal of the public sector and to cover its shortcomings. It will be maintained that the characteristics of institutional development condition social innovation initiatives, specifically the characteristics that make up institutional capacity, just as it has been observed, in most Latin American countries in the last decade, with the guarantee and extension of public services. The existing deficiencies in the coverage of these and in the rest of unmet needs show a vast field of action for social innovation in Latin America.

References

Adams, D. y Hess, Michael (2008), “Social Innovation as a New Public Administration Strategy”, paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Brisbane, March 26-28, http://www.irspm2008.bus.qut.edu.au/papers/documents/pdf, 15-02-2015.

Almond, Gabriel A. y Verba, Sidney (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

ANSPE (coord.) (2014), Catálogo de iniciativas de innovación social para la superación de la pobreza extrema, Bogotá, Agencia Nacional de Superación de la Pobreza Extrema de Colombia.

Arenilla, Manuel (2011), “Redes de políticas: el caso de la ciudad de Madrid”, en Revista Española de Ciencia Política, Nº 25, pp. 31-56.

__________ (2015), “Innovación social: la paulatina construcción del marco teórico”, documento presentado en el XX Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Lima, Perú, 10 al 13 de noviembre de 2015.

Arenilla, Manuel y García-Vegas, Ricardo (2013), Innovación social, Oleiros, Editorial Netbiblo.

__________ (2016), Innovación social: la integración social en la administración pública, Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. 2. ed.

Aspen Institute (2009), The Emerging Fourth Sector, Aspen, Aspen Institute, https://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs, 11-10-2015.

Baena, Mariano (2000), Curso de Ciencia de la Administración, Madrid, Tecnos. Vol. 1.

Bandeira, Pablo (2013), El fortalecimiento de las instituciones públicas en América Latina: situación actual y retos, Madrid, Centro de Estudios de Cooperación al Desarrollo; Universidad San Pablo. Instituto Universitario de Estudios Europeos.

Barroso, José Manuel (2011), “Social Innovation Europe Initiative”, Brussels, European Commission (Speech; N° 11/190), http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-190_en.htm, 15-11-2015.

Bastos Boubeta, Miguel A. (2016), “Redundancia, escala y duplicidad en la administración: una crítica de los mitos acerca de la racionalidad administrativa en las propuestas de la reforma de la administración pública española”, en Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, Nº 65, pp. 129-156.

BEPA (2011), Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg, European Commission. Bureau of European Policy Advisers.

BID (2012), América Latina en PISA 2012, Washington, BID, https://publications.iadb.org, 13 11-2015.

Börzel, Tanja (1997), “¿Qué tienen de especial los policy networks?: explorando el concepto y su utilidad para el estudio de la gobernación europea”, en Redes, http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/policynet.pdf, 06-11-2016.

Bovaird, Tony y Löffler, Elke (2012), “From Engagement to Co-production: the Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcome and Public Value”, en Voluntas, Vol. 23 Nº 4, pp. 1139-1155.

Cahill, Geraldine (2010), “Primer on Social Innovation: a Compendium of Definitions Developed by Organizations around the World”, en The Philanthropist, Vol. 23 Nº 3, pp. 259-272, http://thephilanthropist.ca/original-pdfs/Philanthropist-23-3-441.pdf, 20-11-2015.

Calonje, C. (2016), Metodología pragmática en los centros de formación, Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, mimeo.

Published

2024-08-12

How to Cite

Manuel Arenilla. (2024). Social innovation and institutional capacity in Latin America. Tec Empresarial, 19(2), 65–77. Retrieved from http://revistas.tec-ac.cr/index.php/tec_empresarial/article/view/489