Selection and evaluation of third party logistics in the supply chain: A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v17i2.95Keywords:
Logistics, supply chain, supplier, evaluation, selection, 3PLAbstract
Worldwide it is estimated that more than 85% of the main companies used external logistics services, with growth rates of this services market projected between 18 and 22 percent per year. This trend has generated a growing interest in supply chain researchers to propose different approaches for the selection and evaluation of the performance of third party logistics (3PL). This article proposes a systematic review analyzing a sample of articles published in indexed journals in order to identify the main contributions on this topic. This study shows the evaluation and selection of a 3PL is a critical and complex decision, due to the existence of several criteria of imprecise and subjective basis. As a result, methodological characteristics, approaches used, models applied, attributes of the magazines, and industries that use external logistics providers are presented. Cost, information technology implemented by logistics providers, and the effectiveness of shipments and deliveries on time, are the most valued criteria by companies for the evaluation and selection of 3PL. The results of this study provide support to researchers, as a reference that allows identifying some possibilities for future research in the field of providers that offer external logistics services, promoting competitiveness in the supply chain.
References
Aguezzoul A., 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: a literature review on criteria and methods. Omega-International Journal of
Management Science, 49, 69-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.05.009
Aguezzoul, A. and Pires, S., 2016. 3PL performance evaluation and selection: a MCDM method. Supply Chain Forum: An International
Journal, 17(2), 87-94. DOI: 10.1080/16258312.2016.1176302.
APICS, 2011. Operations Management Body of Knowledge Framework.
APICS The Association for Operations Management. Third Edition.
Chicago, USA.
Armstrong & Associates, Inc., 2017. Global logistics costs and third-party logistics revenues. Disponible en http://www.3plogistics.
com/3pl-market-info-resources/3pl-market-information/global-3pl-market-size-estimates/ [Acceso 10 abril 2019]
Azadi, M. y Saen, R.F., 2011. A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in
the existence of dual-role factors. Expert systems with applications,
(10), 12231-12236. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.001.
Bramer, W, M., Rethlefsen, M,L., Kleijnen, J. and Franco, O.H., 2017.
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6,
-12. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.
Hwang, B.N., Chen, T.T. and Lin, J.T., 2016. 3PL selection criteria in
integrated circuit manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Supply Chain
Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 103-124.
Bianchini, A., 2018. 3PL provider selection by AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 235-252.
DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0125.
Çelebi, D., Bayraktar, D. and Dingol, L., 2010. Analytical network process for logistics management: a case study in a small electronic
appliances manufacturer. Computers and industrial engineering,
(3), 432-441. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.09.002.
Chen, C., Pai, P. and Hung, W., 2010. An integrated methodology using
linguistic promethee and maximum deviation method for third-party logistics supplier selection. International journal of computational
intelligence systems, 3(4), 438-451. DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.2010.3.4.4.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J. and Papadopoulos, T., 2018.
Skills needed in supply chain-human agency and social capital
analysis in third party logistics. Management Decision, 56 (1), 143-
DOI:10.1108/MD-04-2017-0428
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tec Empresarial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






