A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Model for Multi-Agent Coordination in Humanitarian Logistics Systems Under Non-Sub Additive Conditions: A Framework for Indonesia

Authors

  • Vivian Karim Ladesi Department of Port Management and Maritime Logistics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dedi Purwana Postgraduate Program. Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Herlitah Herlitah Department of Economic Education, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Cooperative Game Theory, Humanitarian Logistics, Multi-Agent Coordination, Non-Sub Additive Games, Disaster Response, Humanitarian Supply Chain.

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the world's most disaster-prone countries, experiencing thousands of natural hazard events annually across its archipelago. Effective disaster response requires coordination among diverse stakeholders government agencies (BNPB/BPBD), non-governmental organizations (including PMI), private sector logistics providers, military (TNI), and community organizations. However, collaboration is often hindered by conflicting incentives, coordination costs, and resource constraints. This paper develops a cooperative game theory framework to analyze stakeholder collaboration in Indonesian humanitarian logistics, explicitly modeling coordination costs as functions of coalition size and heterogeneity, allowing for non-sub additive outcomes where larger coalitions may be less efficient. Using empirically-informed parameters derived from BNPB operational data, disaster response literature, and expert-informed estimates, we calibrate the framework to the Indonesian context. All numerical parameters (standalone costs c_i, efficiency parameters e_i, coordination cost coefficients β₀, β₁, β₂, and resulting Shapley values) presented in this paper are constructed for illustrative and methodological demonstration purposes. They are informed by existing literature and BNPB data patterns but do not represent actual expenditure data from any specific disaster event. The primary contribution of this paper is the mathematical framework itself and its application to the Indonesian multi-stakeholder context, not the specific numerical findings. Empirical validation with real transaction-level data from Indonesian disaster responses is required before the framework can inform actual policy decisions. Key illustrative findings from our calibrated model include: (1) the private sector generates the highest marginal value (Shapley value share: approximately 34% of total savings), supporting prioritization of public-private partnerships; (2) grand coalitions (5 players) may exhibit non-sub additive outcomes when coordination costs exceed marginal benefits; (3) community organizations may require subsidy mechanisms to participate effectively; (4) capacity building for community organizations (increasing efficiency from baseline to 0.65) raises their Shapley value significantly. The framework offers a rigorous analytical tool for disaster policymakers in Indonesia and contributes to humanitarian logistics theory by extending cooperative game theory to a new context with explicit non-sub additive modeling and empirical grounding in Indonesian disaster response patterns.

References

Altay, N., & Iii, W. G. G. (2006). Interfaces with Other Disciplines OR / MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(December 2004), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016

Anisya S. Thomas. (2005). Understanding Humanitarian Supply Chains. In FROM LOGISTICS TO SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: THE THE PATH FORWARD IN THE HUMANITARIAN SECTOR (pp. 1–15). Fritz Institute.

Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., & Ramirez, M. (2010). Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: Practices, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 22–34.

Balza-franco, V., Magdalena, U., Paternina-arboleda, C. D., & Ramírez-ríos, D. G. (2017). A collaborative supply chain model for non-for-profit networks based on cooperative game theory. Int. J. Logistics Systems and Management, 26(4).

Bealt, J., Fernández Barrera, J. C., & Mansouri, S. A. (2016). Collaborative relationships between logistics service providers and humanitarian organizations during disaster relief operations. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 6(2), 118–144.

Behl, A., & Dutta, P. (2018). Humanitarian supply chain management : a thematic literature review and future directions of research. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2806-2

Beiki Ashkezari, A., Zokaee, M., Rabbani, E., Rabbani, M., & Aghsami, A. (2024). A scenario-based game theory integrating with a location-allocation-routing problem in a pre-and post-disaster humanitarian logistics network under uncertainty. Journal of Modelling in Management, 19(5), 1686–1718.

Chen, F., Liu, S., & Appolloni, A. (2020). Horizontal coordination of I-LNGOs in the humanitarian supply chain: an evolutionary game approach. Sustainability, 12(15), 5953.

Crescent, R. (2015). Defining logistics preparedness : a framework and research agenda. In Emerald (pp. 1–35).

Das, D. (2022). Values of N-Person Games with Indivisibility and Complementarity. Available at SSRN 4073731.

Data Informasi Bencana Indonesia: Sumatra Floods. (2025). BNPB (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana).

Day, J. M., Melnyk, S. A., Larson, P. D., Davis, E. W., & Whybark, D. C. (2012). Humanitarian and disaster relief supply chains: a matter of life and death. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 21–36.

Diehlmann, F., Lüttenberg, M., Verdonck, L., Wiens, M., Zienau, A., & Schultmann, F. (2021). Public-private collaborations in emergency logistics: A framework based on logistical and game-theoretical concepts. Safety Science, 141, 105301.

Ergün, S., Usta, P., Alparslan Gök, S. Z., & Weber, G. W. (2023). A game theoretical approach to emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research, 324(1), 855–868.

Ferrell, W., Ellis, K., Kaminsky, P., & Rainwater, C. (2020). Horizontal collaboration: opportunities for improved logistics planning. International Journal of Production Research, 58(14), 4267–4284.

Gatignon, A., & Wassenhove, L. N. Van. (2010). The Yogyakarta earthquake : Humanitarian relief through IFRC ’ s decentralized supply chain. Int. J. Production Economics Journal, 126, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.003

Gorji, M.-A., & Shetab-Boushehri, S.-N. (2020). REVIEW OF GAME THEORY APPLICATIONS IN EVACUATION MANAGEMENT. Journal of Dynamics and Games, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3934/jdg.2026012

Grange, R., Heaslip, G., & McMullan, C. (2020). Coordination to choreography: the evolution of humanitarian supply chains. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 21–44.

Handayani, N. U., & Mustikasari, A. (2018). Coordination and collaboration functions of disaster management centers for humanitarian logistics: a case study at merapi eruption. MATEC Web of Conferences, 159, 01046.

Hausken, K. (2025). A Review of Game Theory in Pandemics, Social Media Media Rumors, and Disasters. International Game Theory Review, 2530001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198925300016

Holguín-veras, J., Jaller, M., Wassenhove, L. N. Van, Pérez, N., & Wachtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7–8), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.08.003

INDONESIA, P. R. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.

Joseph D. Martin, S. (2018). Indonesia Disaster Management Reference Handbook provides.

Khoidir, A. (2025). Prioritizing Critical Success Factors in Humanitarian Supply Chains : A Hybrid Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 26(2), 221–238.

Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. M. (2010). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Disaster Relief Operations, 40(8/9), 636–656.

Lee, D. W. (2019). Local government’s disaster management capacity and disaster resilience. Local Government Studies, 45(6), 803–826.

Mclachlin, R., Larson, P. D., Mclachlin, R., & Larson, P. D. (2011). Building humanitarian supply chain relationships : lessons from leading practitioners. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426741111122402

Moshtari, M., & Goncalves, P. (2017). Factors Influencing Inter-Organizational Collaboration within a Disaster Relief Context. International Society for Third Sector Research, 28(1), 1–2.

Oktarina, R., & Wijaksono, S. (2020). Model of stakeholder collaborative for disaster logistics in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 426(1), 012114.

Pascucci, E. (2021). More logistics, less aid: Humanitarian-business partnerships and sustainability in the refugee camp. World Development, 142, 105424.

Rama, V. K., & Prasad, M. V. D. (2021). Use of Cooperative Game theory in day-to-day Farmer Producer organization ’ s Operations. Madridge Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Research, 3(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.18689/mjaes-1000111

Ruesch, L., Tarakci, M., Besiou, M., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2022). Orchestrating coordination among humanitarian organizations. Production and Operations Management, 31(5), 1977–1996.

Sabahfar, S. (2024). Improving humanitarian supply chain operations through multi-agency collaborations using cooperative game theory. Kansas State University.

Salman, S., & Pashapour, A. (2024). Relief item inventory planning under centralized and decentralized bilateral cooperation and uncertain transshipment quantities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

Shao, J., Wang, X., Liang, C., & Holguín-veras, J. (2019). Research progress on deprivation costs in humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101343

Shapley, L. S. (2010). A VALUE FOR n-PERSON GAMES. In A VALUE FOR n-PERSON GAMES (pp. 152–153). Cornell University Library.

Soyster, A. L., Murphy, F., Toof, D., & Lev, B. (2026). Shapley inspired solutions to linear programming based N-Person cooperative games. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 1–13.

Tatham, P., & Kovacs, G. (2010). The application of ‘“ swift trust ”’ to humanitarian logistics. Int. J. Production Economics Journal, 126, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.006

Team, E., Awan, G. M., Faisal, S., Hoegl, J., Mccosker, L., Cross, A. R., Liew, S. H., Tampubolon, A., & Indonesia, P. M. (2019). Real-Time Evaluation Indonesia : Earthquakes and Tsunami ( Lombok , Sulawesi) 2018 (Issue January).

Wassenhove, L. Van. (2006). Blackett Memorial Lecture w Humanitarian aid logistics : supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602125

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Ladesi, V. K., Purwana, D., & Herlitah, H. (2026). A Cooperative Game-Theoretic Model for Multi-Agent Coordination in Humanitarian Logistics Systems Under Non-Sub Additive Conditions: A Framework for Indonesia. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 21(2), 429–449. Retrieved from https://revistas.tec-ac.cr/index.php/tec_empresarial/article/view/906