Academic Ethics in Research Methodology

Authors

  • Sombat Tayraukham Universidad de Salamanca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v19i1.432

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate academic ethics in research methodology of Mahasarakham University’s Graduate Students, to compare between academic ethics in research methodology of Masters students and that of doctoral students and to construct predictive equations of factors that were related to behavioral academic ethics in research methodology. The samples of the study were 66 doctoral students and 434 Master students, who were enrolled in the faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University. The research instrument included: a 30-items scale on the academic ethics in research methodology with discriminating powers ranging from 0.19-0.63 and a reliability of 0.8645. The collected data were analyzed by percentage, mean and standard deviation t-test. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient and Multiple Regression Analysis were employed for hypothesis testing. The results of the study showed: that all students who involved as the sample of the study had average scores of 26.35 (SD = 3.00) on academic ethics knowledge and 26.41 (SD = 3.06) on academic ethics behavior, while their attitude score toward academic ethics was at a high level, that there was no difference among masters students and doctoral student in terms of academic ethics knowledge score, academic ethics attitude score and academic ethics behavior score and that academic ethics knowledge and attitude toward academic ethics could predict academic ethics behavior. The multiple correlation coefficient (R) was 0.908 with predicting powers at 82.40%. The equations in the raw-scores form and standard-score form could be written as: the predictive equations in the raw-score form: Y’ = 1.072 + 0.877 know + 0.560 Att and the predictive equations in the standard-score form: Zy’ = 0.860Zknow + 0.081ZAtt.

References

Abad, M. P. (2011). El delito de juegos prohibidos: análisis histórico-jurídico. Librería-Editorial Dykinson.

Alamillos Álvarez, R. (2015). Hechicería y brujería en Andalucía en la Edad Moderna. Discursos y prácticas en torno a la superstición en el siglo XVIII.

Ansón Calvo, M. D. C. (1977). Tarazona y su partido en la época de la ilustración.

Aranda Arribas, V. (2019). LOPE HUERTA, Arsenio (Madrid, 2015). El juego en tiempos del Quijote.

Archivo Histórico Provincial de Córdoba (en adelante AHPCO), Justicia Local de Rute, legajo 2326, expediente 24, folio 9.

Builes Cesteros, R. (2017). La Hispania romana, en la programacion de geografía e historia de 1º de la ESO.

Clissa, K. (2007). Lenguaje e identidad social en la Córdoba colonial. Anuario del Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos SA Segreti, (7), 391-410.

De Vega, L. (2018). El acero de Madrid. Ediciones Cátedra.

Dedieu, J. P. (2002). La vara quebrada de la justicia. Un estudio histórico sobre la delincuencia madrileña entre los siglos XVI y XVIII.

Di Gresia, L. A. (2007). Conflictos y armonías en el sur bonaerense. Conflictividad, penalidad y extrajudicialidad desde la Justicia de Paz (Tres Arroyos, 1865-1902). Anuario del Centro de Estudios Históricos" Prof. Carlos SA Segreti", 7(7), 41-74.

Published

2024-04-23

How to Cite

Sombat Tayraukham. (2024). Academic Ethics in Research Methodology. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 19(1), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v19i1.432