The mediating role of personnel training between innovation and performance: Evidence from the German pharmaceutical industry

Authors

  • Julen Castillo Apraiz Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v16i3.33

Keywords:

Innovation, pharmaceutical industry, personnel training, performance, mediation, IPMA

Abstract

Purpose – The need for companies to become more innovative has never been greater, because innovation helps them deal with a turbulent environment by providing them a sustainable competitive advantage. In this sense, it has been generally accepted that a successful innovative environment requires a welltrained work force. Nevertheless, the literature showing how personnel training drives the innovationperformance relationship in industries where innovation is a key factor is scarce, especially in high-tech industries such as the pharmaceutical industry. Thus, we build upon existing studies to contribute to the innovation and training-related literature by considering the latter as a mediating variable between innovation and business performance. Hence, we aim to assess the impact of innovation on performance, and bring new insights into the innovation-performance link by including training as a variable that drives the aforementioned relationship. Design/methodology – We apply the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique to a sample of German pharmaceutical firms. The data were collected in mid-2014 by means of a computerassisted telephone interviewing (CATI) procedure. As a result, 200 valid responses were obtained from CEOs. Findings – First, this study demonstrates that both innovation and personnel training have a significant, positive impact on performance. Second, the results suggest that training personnel does indeed positively mediate the innovation-performance link. Hence, our study helps explain how innovation effectively translates into greater levels of performance. Originality / value – We answer calls to clarify about the innovation-personnel training relationship to generate greater levels of performance in turbulent environments. Furthermore, we assess this fact in the pharmaceutical industry, where paradoxically there is a lack of studies within the aforementioned framework.

References

Akan, O., Allen, R. S., Helms, M. M., and Spralls, S. A. I., 2006. Critical tactics for implementing Porter’s generic strategies. The journal of business strategy, 27 (1), 43-53.

Ali, M., Kan, K. A. S., and Sarstedt, M., 2016. Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of business research, 69 (11), 5317-5323.

Allen, R. S., and Helms, M. M., 2006. Linking strategic practices and organizational performance to Porter’s generic strategies. Business process management journal, 12 (4), 433-454.

Arzubiaga, U., 2019. Gobernanza corporativa y orientación emprendedora de las pymes familiares: un análisis de la influencia de la implicación familiar a distintos niveles. Cuadernos de gestión, 19 (1), 119-146.

Arzubiaga, U., Castillo-Apraiz, J., and Palma-Ruiz, J. M. 2019. Competitive advantage development in family firms by transforming entrepreneurial orientation into CSR: evidence from Spain. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurial Leadership and Competitive Strategy in Family Business (pp. 112-128). IGI Global.

Arzubiaga, U., Maseda, A., and Iturralde, T., 2019. Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: the moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management. Review of managerial science, 13 (1), 1-31.

Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M. J., and Winston, T., 2007. Export market participation, investments in R&D and worker training, and the evolution of firm productivity. The world economy, 30 (1), 83-104.

Axtell, C. M., Maitlis, S., and Yearta, S. K., 1997. Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer of training. Personnel review, 26 (3), 201-213.

Azar, G., and Ciabuschi, F., 2017. Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International business review, 26 (2), 324-336.

Barba-Aragón, M. I., 2014. La habilidad de los directivos y su papel mediador entre formación e innovación. Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa, 23 (3), 127-136.

Bauer, M., and Leker, J., 2013. Exploration and exploitation in product and process innovation in the chemical industry. R&D Management, 43 (3), 196-212.

Beugelsdijk, S., 2008. Strategic human resource practices and product innovation. Organization studies, 29 (6), 821-847.

Blandy, R., Hawke, A., Webster, E., and Dockery, A. M., 2000. Does training pay?: evidence from Australian enterprises: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

Blunch, N.-H., and Castro, P., 2005. Multinational enterprises and training revisited: do international standards matter?: Social Protection, World Bank.

Booth, A. L., 1991. Job‐related formal training: who receives it and what is it worth? Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 53 (3), 281-294.

Booth, A. L., and Snower, D. J., 1996. Acquiring Skills: Market Failures, their Symptoms and Policy Responses: Cambridge University Press

Published

2021-10-18

How to Cite

Julen Castillo Apraiz. (2021). The mediating role of personnel training between innovation and performance: Evidence from the German pharmaceutical industry. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 16(3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v16i3.33