Gender Ideology in Class Discourse: Studies in Junior High Schools in Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v18i2.245Keywords:
Gender Ideology, Language, Educative Value.Abstract
This study aims to describe gender ideology in class discourse, namely the embodiment of gender ideology, the meaning of gender ideology, and the application of gender ideology in class discourse. This research is a qualitative research with a critical discourse analysis approach and gender theory. The research data is in the form of classroom discourse conducted by teachers and students in junior high schools in Bali which are then transcribed into written presentations in the form of conversation units that represent gender ideology in class discourse. Data analysis includes three dimensions, namely discourse analysis, processing analysis, and social analysis which are then modified into language description, interpretation, and explanation. The use of words and sentences in class discourse by teachers and students as a means to convey certain intentions and meanings that are gender oriented. The meaning of gender ideology in class discourse includes gender ideology as a belief system and gender ideology as a system of action. The application of values in actions, behaviors and attitudes that determine how to see oneself and how to perceive and treat others. The implications of this study place presentation as an important part of its analysis, how one party, group, person, idea, or event is displayed in a certain way by discourse, which influences meaning when received by the interlocutor.
References
Aaltio, I., & Mills, A. J. (Eds. ). (2003). Gender , Identity and the Culture of.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality. In Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
Bamman, D., Eisenstein, J., & Schnoebelen, T. (2014). Gender Identity And Lexical Variation In Social Media 1 David Bamman, Jacob Eisenstein, and Tyler Schnoebelen. 2014, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080/abstract
Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic Stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7(3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x
Bean, J. P. (1995). Conversation and gender in a university composition program. University of North Carolina at Greensboro).
Bergvall, V. L. (1996). Investigating Classroom Discourse. Routledge.
Cameron, D. (2012). Gender Issues in Language Change. Language and Linguistics in Context: Readings and Applications for Teachers, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929124
Coates, H. (2005). The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. In Quality in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500074915
Darma, Y. A. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis (1st ed.). Yrama Widya.
Dunlap, S. T., & Barth, J. M. (2019). Career Stereotypes and Identities: Implicit Beliefs and Major Choice for College Women and Men in STEM and Female-Dominated Fields. Sex Roles, 81(9–10), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1013-1
Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., Eckes, T., Freiburger, P., Huang, L. L., Fernández, M. L., Manganelli, A. M., Pek, J. C. X., Castro, Y. R., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Six-Materna, I., & Volpato, C. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54(9–10), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9027-x
Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional Design and Emerging Teaching Models in Higher Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5–6), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00021-8
Er, S. (2013). Using Total Physical Response Method in Early Childhood Foreign Language Teaching Environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1766–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.113
Fakih, M. (2013). Analisis Gender & Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Gormley, S. (2015). Language and Gender. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53055-4
Hamidah, S. C. (2014). Representasi Ideologi Gender dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Hanandini, D. (2019). Socialization, Internalization, and Social Control: The Study On Teenager Users a Motorcycle In Traffic. 5–6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-9-2018.2281278
Handojono, M., & Matrutty, T. J. F. K. (2021). The Effect of Internalization of Local Culture on Auditor’S Skepticism. International Journal of Economics, Bussiness and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(2), 386–398.
Hoogensen, G., & Rottem, S. V. (2004). Security Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010604044974
Kalil, I. O. (2019). “Gender Ideology ” Incursions In Education. 115–123.
Karaarslan, G. (2011). Elementary Students ’Self -Efficacy Beliefs in Science : Role of Grade Level, Gender, and Socio-Economic Status. 22(1), 72–79.
LoCasale-Crouch, J., & DeCoster, J. (2012). Variation in Teachers’ Instructional Interactions within Two Interventions: Associations with Intervention Responsiveness and Teacher/Classroom Characteristics. Society for Research on ….
McQueen, A. C. H. (2004). Emotional Intelligence in Nursing Work. In Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03069.x
Mills, S. (1997). Language and Gender. Interdisiplinary Perspectives. Longman.
Muchira, J. M. (2013). Intersection (S) between Sociocultural Knowledge, Classroom Discourse And Stance.
Nucci, L., Narvaez, D., & Krettenauer, T. (2014). Handbook of Moral and Character Education. In Handbook of Moral and Character Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896
Odutayo, A. O., & Ramsaroop, S. (2023). Experiences of Student-Teachers : Implications for Refined Student-Support. 22(7), 87–103.
Pehmer, A., Seidel, T., Kiemer, K., & Gr, A. (2015). Effects of a Classroom Discourse Intervention on Teachers ’Practice and Students’ Motivation to Learn Mathematics and science. 35, 94–103.
Petek, E. (2013). Teacher’s Beliefs about Classroom Interaction and their Actual Practices: A Qualitative Case Study of a Native and a Non-native English Teacher’s In-class Applications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.176
Proctor-Thomson, S. (2010). Book review: Ethnicity and Gender at Work: Inequalities, Careers and Employment Relations Harriet Bradley and Geraldine Healy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 251 pp. £60 (hbk). ISBN 9781403991751 (hbk). Management Learning, 41(3), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076100410030607
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. In Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667305
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender , Status , and Leadership. 57(4), 637–655.
Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom Discourse Analysis. In Classroom Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775630
Severiens, S., & Dam, G. T. (1997). Gender and Gender Identity Differences in Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1-2), 79-93.
Söylemez, A. S. (2010). A Study on How Social Gender Identity is Constructed in EFL Coursebooks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 747–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.228
Stringer, J. L., & Hopper, R. (1998). Generic he in conversation? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639809384214
Studies, A. (2011). Interpersonal Metafunction of Gender Talk in ELT Classrooms. 1(July), 25–32.
Turner, K. L., & Brown, C. S. (2007). The centrality of gender and ethnic identities across individuals and contexts. Social Development, 16(4), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00403.x
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge. Routledge.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). wood.eagly.2009_Gender_identity.pdf.
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2015). and Sociocultural Perspectives : Cognitive Two Parallel SLA Worlds ? 40(1), 35–58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tec Empresarial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
