Thirty-five years of strategic management research. A country analysis using bibliometric techniques for the 1987-2021 period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v18i1.193Keywords:
Strategic Management, Bibliometrics, Country Analysis, VOS Network AnalysisAbstract
As a significant field of study, thirty-five years of strategic management research has accumulated a substantial amount of knowledge. This bibliometric study explores whether the unlimited flow of knowledge and the globalization of education & research in this time period, could drive away (or deter) the identification and specific interest of research in phenomena of national importance. Using bibliometric techniques and visualization of similarities (VOS) procedures of citation and co-citation analyses, this Paper explores research trends at the country level over 35 years using data from the Web of Science database. The aims are to identify: 1) the most visible and prominent actors at the country, regional, and global-level; 2) the evolution of the subjects of research into strategic management at the country, global, and supra-regional level; and 3) the evolution of journals publishing strategic management research articles by location. Findings suggest that common research subjects coexist at higher levels of aggregation, establishing the “paradigm” or general agreement about the field’s boundaries. Additionally, findings show that at the country level, rather than following a global trend, there is an enduring diversification of research agendas that bow to national and supranational factors from geographically close places.
References
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization
for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289.
Aman, V. (2018). A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge
transfer of internationally mobile scientists. Scientometrics, 117(1),
-247.
Andrade-Valbuena, N. A., & Merigo, J. M. (2018). Outlining new product development research through bibliometrics: Analyzing journals, articles, and researchers. Journal of Strategy and Management,
(3), 328-350.
Andrade-Valbuena, N. A., Merigo-Lindahl, J. M., & Olavarrieta S, S.
(2019). Bibliometric analysis of entrepreneurial orientation. World
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(1), 45-69.
Andrade-Valbuena, N. A., Merigo-Lindahl, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández L, & Nicolas C. (2019). Mapping leading universities in strategy
research: three decades of collaborative networks. Cogent Business
& Management, 7(1)1-26.
Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: business policy for growth and
expansion. McGraw-Hill Book.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century-A
review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52.
Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (p. 822). London: Sage.
Basurto-Flores, R., Guzmán-Vargas, L., Velasco, S., Medina, A., & Hernandez, A. C. (2018). On entropy research analysis: cross-disciplinary knowledge transfer. Scientometrics, 117(1), 123-139.
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018). The geography
of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?. PloS one, 13(3), e0194805.
Boulos, M. N. (2005). On geography and medical journalology: a study
of the geographical distribution of articles published in a leading
medical informatics journal between 1999 and 2004. International
Journal Health Geographics, 4(7), 1-6.
Bruner, R. F., & Iannarelli, J. (2011). Globalization of management education. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 22(4), 232-242.
Burns, L. R., & Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of
matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of management
journal, 36(1), 106-138.
Calof, J. L., & Wright, S. (2008). Competitive intelligence: A practitioner, academic and inter-disciplinary perspective. European Journal of
marketing, 42(7/8), 717-730.
Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Coronado, F. C. (2017). Big names
in innovation research: a bibliometric overview. Current Science,
(8), 1507-1518.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history
of the American enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, 4(2), 125-137.
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Service systems: a broadened
framework and research agenda on value propositions, engagement,
and service experience. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 6-22.
Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Mapping the research
trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project.
Procedia Computer Science, 91, 547-555.
Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se
institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección y
Economía de la Empresa, 23(1), 22-30.
Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). Perspective-Rigor and relevance in
organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization science, 19(1), 177-183.
De Meyer, A. (2012). Reflections on the globalization of management
education. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 336-345.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3),
-1831.
Ferreira, M. P., Santos, J. C., de Almeida, M. I. R., & Reis, N. R. (2014).
Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2550-2558.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). It’s a flat world, after all. The New York Times,
, 33-37.
Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: the hard reality of global
expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-47.
Ghemawat, P. (2007a). Why the world isn’t flat. Foreign policy, 54-60.
Ghemawat, P. (2007b). Managing differences: The central challenge of
global strategy. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 58-68.
Ghemawat, P. (2008). The globalization of business education: through
the lens of semi globalization. Journal of Management Development,
(4), 391-414.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
Hu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis. Information processing & management, 51(4), 329-339.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural,
economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton university
press.
Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. The academy of management
annals, 4(1), 317-357.
Koseoglu, M. A. (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence
from the Strategic Management Journal. BRQ Business Research
Quarterly, 19(3), 153-170.
Kraus, S., Filser, M., Eggers, F., Hills, G. E., & Hultman, C. M. (2012).
The entrepreneurial marketing domain: a citation and co-citation
analysis. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship,
(1), 6-26.
Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain
of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics,
(1), 3-19.
Leydesdorff, L. & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground
in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23-36.
Linton J. (2004). Perspective: Ranking business schools on the management of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management,
(6), 416-430.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tec Empresarial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.