Analysing the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance: the role of the economic cycle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v15i2.16Keywords:
Corporate strategy, diversification, economic cycle, performanceAbstract
The relationship between corporate strategies and firm performance has been one of the key debates in the discipline of Strategic Management. There are studies that analyse the moderating role that certain variables may play in that relationship. These variables tend to refer to aspects within the firm or, at the very least, within the competitive environment in which a firm operates. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence on the part the general environment plays from an economic perspective is much less common, and focuses on large corporations and on periods of economic growth. Accordingly, using a panel of 1,828 Spanish manufacturing firms of different sizes, an analysis is conducted of the differences in Return On Assets (ROA), Growth in Sales (GS) and Labor Productivity (LP) between specialised firms, those with related diversification, and those with unrelated diversification, between 2002 and 2011, in which there was a period of growth alternated with another one of economic recession. Although some superiority is noted of related diversification and specialisation over unrelated diversification, the differences between strategies are less significant in periods of economic recession, and vary according to the dimension of performance considered. These results reveal the need to consider the economic cycle as a contingent factor that affects the impact corporate strategies have on firm performance.
References
Amit, R., and Livnat, J., 1988. Diversification strategies, business cycles and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 99-110.
Ansoff, H. I., 1957. Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.
Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Manage-ment, 17(1), 99-120.
Bausch, A., and Krist, M., 2007. The effect of context-related moderators on the inter-nationalization-performance relationship: Evidence from meta-analysis. Management International Review, 47(3), 319-347.
Bengtsson, L., 2000. Corporate strategy in a small open economy: Reducing product diver-sification while increasing international diversification. European Management Jour-nal, 18(4), 444-453.
Benito, D., Guerras, L. Á., and Zuñiga, J. Á., 2012. Four decades of research on product diversification: a literature review. Management Decision, 50(2), 325-344
Berger, P. G., and Ofek, E., 1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journal of Finan-cial Economics, 37(1), 39-65.
Campa, J. M., and Kedia, S., 2002. Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1731-1762.
Cerrato, D., Alessandri, T., and Depperu, D., 2016. Economic crisis, acquisitions and firm performance. Long Range Planning, 49(2), 171-185.
Chakrabarti, A., Singh, K., and Mahmood, I., 2007. Diversification and performance: evi-dence from East Asian firms. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 101-120.
Chandler, A. D., 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De la Fuente, G., and Velasco, P., 2015. The effect of the financial crisis on the value of corporate diversification in Spanish firms. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 44(1), 1-23.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., and Sarin, A., 1997. Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 135-160.
Dimovski, V., and Škerlavaj, M., 2005. Performance Effects of Organizational Learning in a Transitional Economy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 3(4), 56-67.
Elango, B., and Sethi, S. P., 2007. An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigm. Management Inter-national Review, 47(3), 369-392.
Forcadell, F. J., 2002. Análisis dinámico de la relación entre diversificación empresarial y recursos tecnológicos. una aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas. Tesis, (Dr). Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
Gort, M., 1962. Diversification and Integration in American Industry. Princenton: Princen-ton University Press.
Grant, R. M., 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., and Thomas, H., 1988. Diversity, Diversification, and Profi-tability among British Manufacturing Companies, 1972-84. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771-801.
Guerras, L. Á., and Navas, J. E., 2007. La dirección estratégica de la empresa. Teoría y aplicaciones. Madrid: Thomson Civitas.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., 1999. Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Huerta, P., Martínez, P., and Navas, J. E., 2004. Cómo medir la diversificación corporativa: Una aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas. Theoría: Ciencia, Arte y Humani-dades, 13, 59-68.
Huerta, P., Pedraja, L., Navas, J. E., and Almodóvar, P. A., 2008. Las estrategias corporati-vas y los resultados empresariales: un análisis por tipo de estrategia corporativa y sector industrial en España. Cuadernos de Administración, 21(37), 61-71.
Imel, B., and Helmberger, P., 1971. Estimation of Structure-Profit Relationships with Application to the Food Processing Sector. American Economic Review, 61(4), 614-627.
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agen-cy costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Tec Empresarial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
