The university image: a model of overall image and stakeholder perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v15i1.13Keywords:
University, higher education, image, stakeholders, formative measurement model, measurement invariance.Abstract
In order to further knowledge regarding the factors that have most influence on the university image, a measurement model was established in this research from the perspective of society and validated using covariance structure analysis. In addition, to ascertain whether such factors and/or their degree of influence differ among stakeholders, an evaluation of measurement invariance was conducted to find out what implications there are for image formation when the perspectives of the different stakeholders are considered. Five samples of stakeholders were used (society, prospective students, current students, graduates, and companies), totaling 1760 respondents. The results showed that affective image, perception of teaching resources, and perception of graduate training significantly influence the formation of overall university image from the perspective of society and that the image structure identified from this perspective is shared by companies, although some differences are observed. However, the model needs adapting to consider the perspectives of prospective students, current students, and graduates. The results also suggested that affective issues have a major importance in image formation from the perspective of all the stakeholders considered and that it is in the cognitive aspects where differences between them become more patent. These findings constitute a valuable contribution for marketing literature as so few works have addressed the study of the university image adopting the standpoint of society or the comparison of different stakeholders. Further, they provide guidance to university managers when determining which aspects are recommendable to act upon for the projection of a favorable image to various audiences.
References
Aghaz, A., Hashemi, A. and Sharifi Atashgah, M.S., 2015. Factors contributing to univer-sity image: The postgraduate students’ points of view. Journal of marketing for higher education, 25 (1), 104-126.
Alessandri, S.W., Yang, S.U. and Kinsey, D.F., 2006. An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Corporate reputation review, 9 (4), 258-270.
Alexander, D.C., 1971. A construct of the image and a method of measurement. Journal of communication, 21 (2), 170-178.
Alves, H. and Raposo, M., 2010. The influence of university image on student behaviour. International journal of educational management, 24 (1), 73-85.
Arpan, L.M., Raney, A.A. and Zivnuska, S., 2003. A cognitive approach to understanding university image. Corporate communications: An international journal, 8 (2), 97-113.
Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y., 1988. On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of marketing research, 26 (August), 271-284.
Bakanauskas, A. and Sontaite, M., 2011. Measurement model of corporate reputation at higher education institutions: Customers’ perspective. Management of organizations: Systematic research, (59), 115-130.
Baker, S. and Brown, B., 2007. Images of excellence: Constructions of institutional pres-tige and reflections in the university choice process. British journal of sociology of education, 28 (3), 377-391.
Balmer, J.M.T. and Liao, M.N., 2007. Student corporate brand identification: An explora- tory case study. Corporate communication: An international journal, 12 (4), 356-375.
Bardo, J.W., Ross, R.H. and Headley, E.L., 1990. Measuring alumni’s image of a universi-ty. Journal for higher education management, 6 (1), 29-44
Beerli, A., Díaz Meneses, G. and Pérez Pérez, P., 2002. The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of educational ad-ministration, 40 (5), 486-505.
Bentler, P.M. and Bonett, D.G., 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88 (3), 588-606.
Bosch, J., Venter, E., Han, Y. and Boshoff, C., 2006. The impact of brand identity on the perceived brand image of a merged higher education institution: Part one. Management dynamics, 15 (2), 10-30.
Brown, R. and Mazzarol, T., 2009. The importance of institutional image to student satis-faction and loyalty within higher education. Higher education, 58 (1), 81-95.
Buil, I., Martínez, E. and De Chernatony, L., 2010. Medición del valor de marca desde un enfoque formativo [Brand equity measurement from a formative approach]. Cuadernos de gestión, 10 (special issue), 167-196.
Byrne, B.M., 2006. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J. and Muthén, B., 1989. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psycho-logical bulletin, 105 (3), 456-466.
Cervera, A., Schlesinger, W., Iniesta, M.Á. and Sánchez, R., 2012. Medición de la ima-gen de la universidad y sus efectos sobre la identificación y lealtad del egresado: Una aproximación desde el modelo de Beerli y Díaz (2003) [Measurement of university image and its impact on graduate identification and loyalty: An approach on the basis of Beerli and Díaz’s model (2003)]. Revista española de investigación en marketing ESIC, 16 (2), 7-29.
Chen, C.F. and Chen, C.T., 2014. The effect of higher education brand images on satis-faction and lifetime value from students’ viewpoint. Anthropologist, 17 (1), 137-145.
Chen, Y.C., 2015. A study of the interrelationships among service recovery, relationship quality, and brand image in higher education industries. The Asia-Pacific education researcher, 24 (1), 81-89.
Curtis, T., Abratt, R. and Minor, W., 2009. Corporate brand management in higher educa-tion: The case of ERAU. Journal of product and brand management, 18 (6), 404-413.
Diamantopoulos, A. and Papadopoulos, N., 2010. Assessing the cross-national invariance of formative measures: Guidelines for international business researchers. Journal of international business studies, 41 (2), 360-370.
Diamantopoulos, A. and Winklhofer, H.M., 2001. Index construction with formative in-dicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of marketing research, 38 (2), 269-277.
Dowling, G., 2001. Creating corporate reputations. Identity, image, and performance. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.
Draelants, H., 2012. A prestigious image: Advantage or obstacle in attracting candidates to French elite higher education? Research papers in education, 27 (5), 555-579.
Duarte, P.O., Alves, H. and Raposo, M., 2010. Understanding university image: A structur-al equation model approach. International review on public and nonprofit marketing, 7 (1), 21-36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Tec Empresarial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
