Is my professional future biased for gender perceptions? A study for the Spanish case with public policy proposals on education

Authors

  • Isabel Novo Corti Universidade da Coruña (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v14i2.10

Keywords:

Glass ceiling, gender, social stereotypes, public policy, education, labor market

Abstract

This article deals with the ‘glass ceiling’ phenomenon based on the fact that a disproportionately low number of women access managerial positions by analyzing gender differences in the ‘educational profile’ and ‘professional profile perceived’. The sample is conducted among 165 undergraduate economics students (54 males and 111 females) in the final year of college in Spain at the time they were planning their future professional career. The methodology used is based on two approaches. First, an analytic model using Structural Equations Model (SEM) that leads us to explore perceptual differences in favorite subjects, professional ambitions, values associated to the workplace and mobility. Second, a causal analysis following the System Dynamics methodology to describe the women’s behavior in explaining their self-exclusion from managerial positions. Findings confirm the existence of an educational system biased by gender and reveals that while men are more ambitious professionally and show greater capacity to geographical mobility, women require greater motivation at work. Moreover, we find that the factors explaining why women are still far from reaching senior management positions are both external (gender stereotypes or organizational policies) and internal ones (self-confidence, self-esteem). Finally, we propose a set of education measures as a starting point to implement public policies which could reduce women´s barriers to break their glass ceiling.

References

ADECCO, 2010. Las directivas españolas pierden la confianza en la Ley y el Ministerio de Igualdad. Madrid: Adecco, IV Adecco Survey.

Agars, M. D., 2004. Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28 (2), 103–111

Alemagno S. and Dickie J., 2005. Employment issues of women in jail. Journal of Employ-ment Counseling, 42 (2), 67–74.

Altman Y. and Shortland S., 2008. Women and international assignments: taking stock. A 25-year review. Human Resource Management, 47 (2), 199–216.

Anastasia T. T., Tremblay J., Kenneth R., Makela C. J. and Drennen N. H., 1999. Student gender differences in perceived importance of college services. College Student Jour-nal, 33 (2), 206-210.

Arfken D. E., Bellar, S. L. and Helms, M. M., 2004. The ultimate glass ceiling revisit-ed: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (2), 177–186.

Bandura, A., 1978. Reflections on self-efficacy. In Rachman, S. J. ed. Advances in behavior research and therapy. Oxford: Pergamon, 237-269.

Bandura, A., 1986. From thought to action: Mechanisms of personal agency. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 15 (1), 1-17.

Barrientos, S., 2001. Gender, Flexibility and Global Value Chains. IDS Bulletin, 32 (3), 83-93.

Baxter Magolda, M. B., 1992. Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns

in students’ intellectual development. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Blickenstaff, J. C., 2005. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gen-der and Education, 17 (4), 369-386.

Bradley, K., 2000. The incorporation of women into higher education: Paradoxical out-comes? Sociology of Education, 73 (1), 1-18.

Brody, L. R. and Hall, J. A., 2010. Gender and emotion. In: Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. M., ed. Handbook of Emotions. New York: Springer, 429-454.

Burleson, B. R., 2003. The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10 (1), 1–23.

Byron, K., 2008. Differential effects of male and female managers´ non-verbal emotional skills on employees´ ratings. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23 (2), 118-134.

Chinchilla, N. and León, C., 2004. La ambición femenina. Cómo re-conciliar trabajo y familia. 1st ed. Madrid: Aguilar.

Colander D. and Holmes J., 2007. Gender and graduate economics education in the US. Feminist Economics, 13 (2), 93-116.

Conner, K.R., 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17 (1), 121-154.

Cotter D.A.M., Hermsen J.M., Ovadia S. and Vanneman, R., 2001. The Glass Ceiling Ef-fect. Social Forces, 80 (2), 655-681.

Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T. and Glick, P. 2004. When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60 (4), 701-718.

Cullen D. L. and Lunab G., 1993. Women Mentoring in Academe: addressing the gender gap in higher education. Gender and Education, 5 (2), 125-137.

Daley, D. M., 1996. Paths of glory and the glass ceiling: differing patterns of career ad-vancement among women and minority federal employees. Public Administration Quarterly, 20 (2), 143- 162.

Published

2019-12-09

How to Cite

Isabel Novo Corti. (2019). Is my professional future biased for gender perceptions? A study for the Spanish case with public policy proposals on education. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 14(2), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v14i2.10