The abilities of managers in UK pension funds. Are socially responsible managers superior?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v14i1.1Keywords:
Pension fund, selectivity, skill, timing, United KingdomAbstract
The abilities of managers in pension funds and, especially, in Socially Responsible (SR) pension funds have only rarely been investigated. Both standard pension funds and specialized SR funds are concerned with social welfare, but SR pension funds present a special interest of study. Various works show that SR managers usually underperform conventional funds because they focus on social aspects, although other studies find that SR funds overperform. In this work, the stock-picking and style timing abilities of UK conventional and SR equity pension fund managers are studied, examining whether SR pension funds implement different strategies and contribute to developing more socially responsible outcomes. Additionally, the influence of SR as a risk factor is introduced. As far as is known, style timing and the introduction of the SR risk factor have not been previously studied in the context of SR pension funds. The results indicate that both kinds of pension fund develop similar investment strategies, investing in small cap and growth values. Moreover, both funds present negative performance, poor/negative stock-picking abilities, and perverse market timing abilities. SR managers exhibit superior style timing skills and are able to correctly time size and book-to-market strategies. The SR risk factor shows that SR pension funds have significantly positive loadings of this factor, which erodes their performance. Overall, none of the funds analyzed develop proper management, and the optimization of the risk-return binomial in SR funds may be constrained by SRI requirements.
References
Albareda, L. and Balaguer, M.R., 2009. The Challenges of Socially Responsible Invest-ment among Institutional Investors: Exploring the Links between Corporate Pension Funds and Corporate Governance. Business and Society Review, 114(1), 31-57.
Amalric, F., 2006. Pension funds, corporate responsibility and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 440-450.
Bauer, R., Dewall, J. and Otten, R., 2007. The ethical mutual fund performance: New evi-dence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124.
Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., and Otten, R., 2005. International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.
Bauer, R., Otten, R. and Tourani, A. R., 2006. Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48.
Becchetti, I. and Fucito, L., 2000. La finanza etica: consideración teoriche e simulación empírica. Revista di Política Economica, 1(Maggio), 29–67.
Bengtsson, E., 2008a. Socially responsible investing in scandinavia - a comparative analy-sis. Sustainable Development, 16(3), 155-168.
Bengtsson, E., 2008b. A history of scandinavian socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 969-983.
Berry, C., 2011. Protecting our best interests. Rediscovering fiduciary obligation. Lon-don: Fair Pensions. Available from http://www.fairpensions.org.uk/sites/default/files/ uploaded_files/fidduty/FPProtectingOurBestInterests.pdf
Bollen, N. and Busse, S., 2001. On the timing ability of mutual fund managers. Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1075–1094.
Camino, D. and López, J., 1995. Un análisis de la inversión ética en España. Boletín de Estudios Económicos, 50(156), diciembre, 519–540.
Carhart, M., 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
Chegut, A., Schenk, H. and Scholtens, B., 2011. Assessing SRI fund performance research: Best practices in empirical analysis. Sustainable Development, 19(2), 77–94.
Christopherson, J.A., Ferson, W.E. and Glassman, D.A., 1998. Conditioning manager al-pha on economic information: another look at the persistence of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 111-142.
Clark, G. L. and Hebb, T., 2005. Why should they care? The role of institutional investors in the market for corporate social responsibility. Environment and Planning A, 37(11), 2015- 2031.
Climent, F. and Soriano, P., 2011. Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 275-287.
Cortez, M.C. and Silva, F., 2002. Conditioning Information on Portfolio Performance Evaluation: A re-examination of performance persistence in the Portuguese mutual fund market. Finance India, 16(4), 1393-1408.
Davis, B., 1999. Profits from Principle, Five Forces Redefining Business. The Futurist, 33(3), 28–33.
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K. and Ter Horst, J., 2011. A tale of values driven and profit seeking social investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(8), 2137-2147.
Domini, A., Kinder, P. and Lydenberg, S., 1992. The Social Investment Almanac: A Com-prehensive Guide to Socially Responsible Investing. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Emel, J., 2002. An Inquiry into the Greeen Financial Disciplining of Capital. Environment and Planning A, 34(5), 827-843.
Entine, J., 2005. The Politization of Public Investment. In: Entine J., ed. Pension Fund Politics. The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing. Washington D. C.: The AEI Press, 1-12.
Eurosif, 2011. Corporate Pension Funds and Sustainable Investment Study.
Eurosif, 2016. European SRI Study 2016. European Sustainable Investment Forum.
Fama, E., and French, K., 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Tec Empresarial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
