Public Policy Reform in Indonesia: Navigating Bureaucratic Culture in the Age of Disruption

Authors

  • Sahya Anggara UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v20i2.637

Abstract

Public policy reform in Indonesia faces unique challenges due to the persistence of a hierarchical and rigid bureaucratic culture that often resists change. In the age of disruption, characterized by rapid technological advancements, shifting social expectations, and economic volatility, the need for adaptive and responsive governance has become more urgent. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of public policy reform in Indonesia by examining the interplay between bureaucratic culture and the demand for innovation in governance. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research draws on policy documents, expert interviews, and secondary literature to explore how Indonesia has navigated reforms such as digital bureaucracy initiatives, e-government, and decentralization. The findings highlight three critical insights: first, while Indonesia has made progress in adopting digital governance platforms, bureaucratic resistance and rigid procedures remain major obstacles; second, leadership and organizational culture play a pivotal role in shaping reform outcomes; and third, collaborative governance and citizen participation offer promising pathways to bridge the gap between traditional bureaucracy and modern policy demands. The study contributes to the discourse on governance reform by demonstrating that successful public policy transformation in Indonesia requires not only technological and structural innovation but also cultural shifts within the bureaucracy itself. This research provides both theoretical insights and practical implications for policymakers, emphasizing the importance of aligning reform strategies with contextual realities in developing countries.

References

Agustina, H. (2020). Bureaucracy Culture in Public Service in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Management, Business, Applied Science, Engineering and Sustainability Development (ICMASES 2019). EUDL.

Alenezi, M. (2022). Understanding digital government transformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.01797.

Egawati, A. (2022). The impact of New Public Management approach toward digital government in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, 2022-24-05.

Farida, I., & Lestari, A. (2021). Implementation of E-Government as a Public Service Innovation in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 72-79.

Hasyem, M., Ferizaldi, F., Syamsuddin, S., & Tarmidi, T. (2023). Bureaucratic Reform Resistance in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM).

Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

Holmqvist, M., & Pessi, K. (2016). Agile value creation in public sector organizations: Lessons from the Swedish context. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.003

Ishak, D. (2021). Bureaucracy reform through the perspective of public administration in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(1).

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kurniawati, W. O. I., & Saprudin, S. (2025). Ethics in Indonesian Government Bureaucracy: Theoretical Foundations, Historical Evolution, and Contemporary Case Studies. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 6(1).

Luna, A., Kruchten, P., & Moura, H. (2015). Agile governance theory: Concept, construction, and validation. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 3(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-015-0024-9

Malik, K., Tan, T. H., & Ong, S. H. (2023). Digital governance and the transformation of public administration: Lessons from Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative. Public Administration and Development, 43(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1998

Rizal, M., Sudjatmiko, A., & Soesilo, F. (2024). Bureaucratic transformation through digital governance: Insights from Jakarta Smart City. International Journal of Innovative Research and Social Science, 7(4), 110–124.

Rohimi, U. E. (2025). Public Sector Leadership Reform: Lessons from Bureaucratic Innovation in Indonesia. Leadership Insights and Innovation Journal, 1(2).

Stimmel, C. L. (2016). Building smart cities: Analytics, ICT, and design thinking. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. sustainability, 12(3), 899.

The Jakarta Post. (2024, October 16). Bureaucratic reform minister outlines ministry’s achievements in past decade. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com

Tistasari, R. (2023). Bureaucratic Culture, Ethical Leadership, and Communication in LLDIKTI Region VII, Indonesia. JBMP (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen dan Perbankan), 9(1).

Widowati, L., Setyowati, K., & Suharto, D. G. (2023). Dynamic governance as perspective in Indonesian bureaucracy reform: Qualitative analysis of Indonesian bureaucracy reform based on dynamic governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 403–415.

Wijayanti, A. D., Augustinah, F., & Ferriswara, D. (2023). The Role of Bureaucratic Reform in Enhancing Public Service Quality: Evidence from East Java. Journal of Governance and Public Administration, 2(3).

World Bank. (2024). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Country report – Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Yasa, I. G. W., et al. (2023). Bureaucratic Reform Toward Society 5.0 in Indonesia. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 22(1).

Yusriadi. (2019). Bureaucratic Reform in Public Services: The Role of Organizational Culture in Indonesia. Natapraja: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(2).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

How to Cite

Anggara, S. (2025). Public Policy Reform in Indonesia: Navigating Bureaucratic Culture in the Age of Disruption. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 20(2), 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v20i2.637