Skill Improvement Based on Local Wisdom to Build Santripreneur at the Blitar Islamic Boarding School, Indonesia
Keywords:
Entrepreneur, Boarding, School, Skills.Abstract
This study aims to find out how to improve skills based on local wisdom to build the spirit of an entrepreneur in the Anharul Ulum Islamic Boarding School. This research used mixed methods, adopting a design-embedded experimental model from Cresswell. The subjects were twenty-one students and three teachers at Anharul Ulum Broading School Blitar, Indonesia. Purposive random sampling was used. Data was collected from interviews, surveys, and observation. The data analysis was used to triangulate and SPSS. The study results show that the assessment of student's skills gets a score of 3 with a suitable category in understanding and running a simple onion stick business at the Anharul Ulum Islamic Boarding School. The entrepreneur program impacts effectiveness (N-gain 77,51%) and can increase the level of understanding, with a score of 31,86 from 58,29 to 90,14. Through onion stick-making activities, the santripreneur program has succeeded in developing various essential skills in students. In addition to mastering production skills, students are trained to think critically, analyze data, and innovate in marketing. The program evaluation results showed a significant improvement in ability, with an N-gain value of 77.51.
References
P. Egana-delSol, X. Sun, and P. Sajda, “Neurophysiological markers of emotion regulation predict efficacy of entrepreneurship education,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 7206, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34148-1.
S. Lin, C. De-Pablos-Heredero, J. L. M. Botella, and C. L. Lian, “Influence of Entrepreneurship Education on the Entrepreneurial Intention of Chinese Students Enrolled at Universities in the Community of Madrid,” IEEE Access, vol. XX, pp. 63678–63689, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3284970.
J. Cui, “The impact of entrepreneurship curriculum with teaching models on sustainable development of entrepreneurial mindset among higher education students in china: The moderating role of the entrepreneurial climate at the institution,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13147950.
Y. Frolova, S. A. Alwaely, and O. Nikishina, “Knowledge management in entrepreneurship education as the basis for creative business development,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031167.
A. Martínez-Campillo, M. del P. Sierra-Fernández, and Y. Fernández-Santos, “Service-learning for sustainability entrepreneurship in rural areas: What is its global impact on business university students?,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 19, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11195296.
D. Karlan and M. Valdivia, “Teaching entrepreneurship: Impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions,” Rev. Econ. Stat., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 510–527, 2011, doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00074.
A. A. Ismail, “Immigrant Children, Educational Performance and Public Policy: a Capability Approach,” J. Int. Migr. Integr., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 717–734, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12134-018-0630-9.
B. Budak, “The Contribution of the Non-Muslim Teacher to the Ideal Identity of the Islamic Primary School,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.3390/rel13121150.
G. Acharya, “Improving access to higher education for the ethnic minorities and gender balance in academia: Still some way to go,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 493–494, 2016, doi: 10.1111/aogs.12902.
A. Royani and H. Hepni, “The Survival and Continuity of Islamic Boarding School in the Era of Changes,” J. Penelit., vol. 19, no. 1987, pp. 129–138, 2022, doi: 10.28918/jupe.v19i2.5648.
C. Hastasari, B. Setiawan, and S. Aw, “Students’ Communication Patterns of Islamic Boarding Schools: The Case of Students in Muallimin Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. e08824, pp. 2405–8440, 2022.
M. H. Mokhtari, “Investigating the role of religious beliefs of people interacting with the environment: A case of iranian students at muslim universities,” HTS Teol. Stud. / Theol. Stud., vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.4102/hts.v76i1.6107.
F. Goodyear-Smith, C. Jackson, and T. Greenhalgh, “Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees,” BMC Med. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.
J. Bailie et al., “Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia,” Heal. Res. Policy Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00814-5.
J. Jull, M. Morton-Ninomiya, I. Compton, and A. Picard, “Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: The imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members,” Res. Involv. Engagem., vol. 4, no. 45, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0131-1.
M. Zainuddin, A. Saifudin, L. Lestariningsih, and U. Nahdiyah, “Developing Literacy Skills in Writing Stories for Elementary School by Using Big Book,” J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2023.
D. Yang and K. Babiak, “A study on corporate foundation and philanthropy: Does governance matter for organizational performance?,” Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh., vol. 34, pp. 59–80, 2023, doi: 10.1002/nml.21555.
M. Němec, M. Riedl, V. Jarský, and R. Dudík, “Analysis of Consumer Attitudes as an Important Tool for the Segmentation and Development of the Game Market in the Czech Republic,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 450, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14030450.
A. Khan et al., “Patient perspective in the development of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in seizure disorders: A patient-centric approach,” Patient Prefer. Adherence, vol. 14, pp. 13–21, 2020, doi: 10.2147/PPA.S222642.
J. Straková et al., “Sustainable development economics of enterprises in the services sector based on effective management of value streams,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13168978.
K. Akdim and L. V. Casaló, Perceived value of AI-based recommendations service: the case of voice assistants, vol. 17. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11628-023-00527-x.
J. Åström, W. Reim, and V. Parida, “Value creation and value capture for AI business model innovation: a three-phase process framework,” Rev. Manag. Sci., vol. 16, pp. 2111–2133, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00521-z.
A. T. Rosário and J. C. Dias, “How Industry 4.0 and Sensors Can Leverage Product Design: Opportunities and Challenges,” Sensors, vol. 23, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23031165.
L. Azanedo, G. Garcia-Garcia, J. Stone, and S. Rahimifard, “An overview of current challenges in new food product development,” Sustain., vol. 12, pp. 10–13, 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12083364.
S. D. Klier, R. J. Nawrotzki, N. Salas-Rodríguez, S. Harten, C. B. Keating, and P. F. Katina, “Grounding evaluation capacity development in systems theory,” Evaluation, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 231–251, 2022, doi: 10.1177/13563890221088871.
A. de Ramón Fernández, D. R. Fernández, D. Marcos-Jorquera, and V. G. Iglesias, “Support system for early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on the service-oriented architecture paradigm and business process management strategy: Development and usability survey among patients and health care providers,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.2196/17161.
T. I. Mohamed, “Refine the Students’ Skills Through Design Education to Create Ethical Products,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2158244021998360.
D. Morrison-Love, “Technological problem solving: an investigation of differences associated with levels of task success,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1725–1753, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10798-021-09675-5.
P. S. Soumia et al., “Unfolding the mitochondrial genome structure of green semilooper (Chrysodeixis acuta Walker): An emerging pest of onion (Allium cepa L.),” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273635.
A. Fatimah, P. Setyosari, D. Kuswandi, and H. Praherdhiono, “Development and validation of assessment tools for literacy and numeracy skills in early childhood education,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 200–208, 2024.
Zainudin, Surayanah, Yuniawatika, and Lestariningsih, “Development of MV Maker RPG Game Edublitar Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Numeracy Literacy and Pancasila Profile of Elementary School Students,” SEEJPH, vol. XXV, pp. 1277–1286, 2024.
A. B. Kurnia, T. Lowrie, and S. M. Patahuddin, “The development of high school students’ statistical literacy across grade level,” Math. Educ. Res. J., vol. 36, no. Suppl 1, pp. 7–35, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13394-023-00449-x.
R. Scherer and J. F. Beckmann, “The acquisition of problem solving competence: evidence from 41 countries that math and science education matters,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 1–22, 2014, doi: 10.1186/s40536-014-0010-7.
L. Savadori, M. M. Dickson, R. Micciolo, and G. Espa, “The polarizing impact of numeracy, economic literacy, and science literacy on the perception of immigration,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274680.
A. Grotlüschen, R. Desjardins, and H. Liu, “Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives,” Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 66, no. 2–3, pp. 127–137, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x.
Nadiah Putri Anggraeni, Nidya Nur Mashitoh, Tika Widiya Ningrum, Kevin Cahya Andilla Unwaru, Naili Afkarina, and Lailatul Nuraini, “Education Program for Strengthening Literacy-Numeracy through 10 in 1 Box Media in Elementary School,” Int. J. Community Serv. Learn., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 415–423, 2024, doi: 10.23887/ijcsl.v7i4.68228.
S. Shahane, “A Pathway to ‘ Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN)’ Through Library-Driven Initiatives,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2024.
J. M. Patuawa, C. Sinnema, V. Robinson, and T. Zhu, Addressing inequity and underachievement: Intervening to improve middle leaders’problem-solving conversations, vol. 24, no. 4. Springer Netherlands, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10833-022-09449-3.
B. Priemer et al., “A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 105–130, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490.
E. Kleinman et al., “Analyzing Students’ Problem-Solving Sequences: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach,” J. Learn. Anal., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 138–160, 2022, doi: 10.18608/jla.2022.7465.
O. Toyin Ojo, M. Dorasamy, M. W. Migin, J. Jayabalan, R. Rajeswari, and S. S. Tung, “Academic entrepreneurial engagement for frugal innovation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review,” F1000Research, vol. 10, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73312.3.
E. Xu, W. Wang, and Q. Wang, “The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1.
V. Thomas, “Product design education: A journey?,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, E and PDE 2016, 2016, pp. 228–233.
W. adhitia Guspara, “Design Science: Approach to Build Design Thinking for Student,” Int. J. Creat. Arts Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–31, 2020, doi: 10.24821/ijcas.v7i1.4166.
D. McInerney, “Insights into product design students’ perception of, and engagement with, creativity in design education,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1199–1219, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09766-x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 TEC EMPRESARIAL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
