The Use of Agricultural Applied Technology, Information and Communication Technology in Forest Farmer Groups Panderman District Batu, Batu City

Authors

  • Bekti Nur Utami Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia & Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian, Malang, Indonesia
  • Yayuk Yuliati Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Sugiyanto Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Edi Dwi Cahyono Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v18i2.220

Keywords:

Forest Farmers Group; Technology; Forest.

Abstract

The Panderman Forest Farmers Group is one of the groups that has succeeded in becoming an example of an indigenous community that can use technology to advance itself. This article aims to determine the use of applied technology, information and communication technology in the panderman forest farmer group. Data were collected by conducting in-person observations, in-depth interviews, and group forums with key informants. Interviews were conducted with twentyfive respondents, namely fifteen members of the panderman forest farmer group, five members of village institutions and five employees of related government agencies. The processing of the interview results was carried out using the help of Atlas. Ti application version 9, and the interview was carried out using the help of a voice recording tool. Data was collected from February 2021 to October 2022. The results of the study show that the panderman forest farmer group has made good use of agroforestry technology. There are three leading commodities that are produced and processed using technology, namely eucalyptus (Melaleuca Leucadendra) which is processed into essential oil, porang (Amorphophallus muelleri) processed into meatballs, Bees (Anthophila) produces processed honey. Marketing is also carried out through the use of information and communication technology, namely through cellphones and internet networks that are marketed in e-commerce directly. The use of this technology is an illustration of the group's success in carrying out empowerment.

References

Akbar, I., Myrzaliyeva, Z. K., Tazhekova, A. Z., Saulembayev, A. T., & Kenzhebay, R. N. (2021). Evaluation of the community-based ecotourism development status in the Aksu-Jabagly nature reserve, Kazakhstan. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 35(2), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.35216-662

Amirtham, T., & Joseph, M. J. (2011). ICT and life long learning pedagogy for development and empowerment: An illustration from farmers in India. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.562658

Butkowski, O. K., Baum, C. M., Pakseresht, A., Bröring, S., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2020). Examining the social acceptance of genetically modified bioenergy in Germany: Labels, information valence, corporate actors, and consumer decisions. Energy Research and Social Science, 60(October 2019), 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101308

Ciesielski, M., Tkaczyk, M., Hycza, T., & Taczanowska, K. (2022). Was it really different? COVID-19-pandemic period in long-term recreation monitoring – A case study from Polish forests. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100495

Ghiffari, R. A. (2016). Development of Eucalyptus Oil Agro-industries in Kabupaten Buru. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227(November 2015), 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.150

Mkono, M., Hughes, K., & McKercher, B. (2022). Does the environment matter in the ‘new normal’? Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 3(2), 2021–2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2022.100060

Mohd Danuri, M. S. N., Shahibi, M. S., & Abdul Kadir, M. R. (2019). Transforming smallholder farmers business towards agribusiness: A framework using ICT. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(3), 1635–1658.

Nazir, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian (R. F. Sikumbang (ed.); kesembilan). Ghalia Indonesia.

Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., Agha, M., & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. In International Journal of Surgery (Vol. 78). IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018

Omar, S. S. (2020). Impact of pandemic crisis : COVID-19 on food safety knowledge , attitudes and practices among food workers in Jordan. EurAsian Journal of Biosciences, 14(May), 3581–3586.

Qiu, R. T. R., Park, J., Li, S. N., & Song, H. (2020). Social costs of tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Tourism Research, 84(June), 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102994

Soliño, M., Alía, R., & Agúndez, D. (2020). Citizens’ preferences for research programs on forest genetic resources: A case applied to Pinus pinaster Ait. in Spain. Forest Policy and Economics, 118(October 2019), 102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102255

Ugochukwu, A. (2018). From Agriscience to Agribusiness (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7

Utomo, M. M. B., Sudomo, A., Pieter, L. A. G., Maharani, D., Swestiani, D., Siagian, C. M., Fambayun, R. A., Perdana, A., & Roshetko, J. M. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic: Impacts, Craftsmen’s Living Strategies, and Economic Recovery of Bamboo Handicraft Enterprise in Gunungkidul, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 6(2), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i2.20599

Walter, D., Thanks, S., Kennedy, M., & Nrcs, M. (n.d.). Silvopasture Defined Historical Context Components of Success◦ Livestock husbandry◦ Pasture management ◦ Forest management Integrating the Components Planning and Monitoring.

Zahawi, R. A., Reid, J. L., & Fagan, M. E. (2020). Potential impacts of COVID-19 on tropical forest recovery. Biotropica, 52(5), 803–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12851

Downloads

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

Utami, B. N., Yuliati, Y., Sugiyanto, & Cahyono, E. D. (2023). The Use of Agricultural Applied Technology, Information and Communication Technology in Forest Farmer Groups Panderman District Batu, Batu City. TEC EMPRESARIAL, 18(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1229/tecempresarialjournal.v18i2.220